Thoughts and Perspectives

Does geography work for or against you when getting an education?

Now that I have four academic degrees and am currently not a student for the first time in my life, I have been critically accessing the education I received and its quality. Before going too far, let me say that I greatly enjoyed my decades as a student and had many wonderful experiences. I learned a ton and became a doctor! This short post is not so much about specific classes, professors, and/or institutions but is about the systemic processes that are almost beyond recognition. 

In sum, I now see how geography negatively affected the quality of education I received compared to some (many?) other places in the United States.

In particular, the general conservatism of the area where I was born vastly limited how much I could learn. And that makes me kind of mad, and it makes me feel somewhat betrayed. Institutions of higher education must rise above the hopes and fears of a given time and place…if learning is to truly occur. 

I think about different classes I had and the assignments, lectures, readings and sometimes have wondered why so-and-so was not included given its extreme importance to the topic, and I now see that it was invariably omitted because it would have been “too radical” and “too liberal” for many or most of the students, students who really and truly do not know anything personally and specially about anything, per se, except what their parents or church have said. Assignments almost across-the-board were not designed to truly challenge students but to help people move along with little challenge. Special events, groups, and opportunities were also clearly limited to appease the socially constructed world views belonging to a variety of different parties. Even the discussions and readings for my graduate classes were held back such that nothing too liberal or too radical (or too conservative) was ever on the table.

I have had to educate myself for years, sometimes through trial and error, to help remediate what was skipped or omitted because of what amounts largely to geography alone (geopolitics more specifically). Some of it is for sure related to my personal overwhelming desire to learn and push boundaries. And this is an on-going process.

In the New England states, for example, people simply learn more. They are generally past having conversations as to whether or not science and critical theory are worth learning….they know they are important. Students in Texas all-too-often can’t think about evolution or really Ancient History or anything else to do with science because their church says science is fake and “just a theory.”

And I know that this is not so much an issue of academic freedom but of knowing one’s audience. There are specific lessons (especially related to gender and revolutionary thinkers, for example) that I give or don’t give according to the audience in that class – you don’t want to alienate them from thinking or learning and you don’t want them to reject something out right because their church says…, and you don’t want to not cover something important because it will make them uncomfortable. It’s tricky. I understand both sides of it. 

Again, politics, though, should not dedicate education. The quality of education students receive should not be limited according to geography….according to the fears and politics of their parents and the surrounding culture. Experts need to be trusted and respected. Today’s religions need to adapt or the nation will be in more and more trouble. 

This geography-dictates-destiny reality begins in the public K-12 system. Children in Texas receive a vastly different formal education than children in other states or nations. The State Board of Education, a small group constituted of proud non-experts, votes on whether or not slavery and global warming are true! This (mis)education shapes how children and then adults (can) see and don’t see the world.

The control geography has over destiny might become more apparent when thinking about the formal education not available in some African nations. In this way, of course, Texas would be better. But then, we must ask, is it better (or worse?) to be misinformed than not informed at all?

Who we are and who we can be is shaped simply by where we are born. And that’s sad. And completely not necessary given the wealth and knowledge and resources available. 

Vastly increased funding for public education (K-12 and higher education) is needed. Free college for all would allow institutions of higher education to probe further into everything possible.

How did geography shape your education?

Dr. Andrew Joseph Pegoda

2 replies »

  1. oh wow! I know only a little about K-12 education in Texas but had no idea it was backward all throughout Texas. I have seen some of the work done by specific teachers here where I live and much of it seems pretty progressive. However, as to history topics that you list I know nothing about what is taught (like questioning whether or not slavery existed. Oh, really? I knew some politicians in Texas were in denial, but everyone?).

    I am not surprised that you state it is as conservative as you mention. I have seen too many students in freshman biology who have difficulty with the concepts of evolution to not miss the stranglehold that religion has on many of them–but not all of them. I thought that it just reflected this region and not the whole state. I guess the problem is much more widespread than I thought.

    How can Texas say it has free speech when it censors what is taught in its public schools? One can argue that some censorship is necessary when teaching the young because most parents do not want their kids coming home using impolite or offensive speech. I had no idea that they classified slavery as such. After all, that is why we censor certain speech on TV and radio shows. How can this country claim free speech as one of the basic inalienable rights of U.S. citizens and allow censorship that goes way beyond promoting polite speech?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I was raised outside Texas, but still south of the Mason Dixon Line, in Virginia (“Mother of Presidents” as we were told, since the first five Presidents of the United States were Virginians). I also was educated grades one through thirteen (first year of college) in an era where the “Great Confederacy” was strongly respected and “States’ Rights” were more important to politicians than “Big Government.” It was also a time when segregation was “acceptable” or “the norm” and Virginia fought hard against it. Things have changed drastically there since I left Virginia in 1964 (for the better, I hope).
    In some ways, Texas was a bit more progressive, much friendlier (No one asked, “Honey, who are your people?”), and yet I was shocked that the judges were elected, not appointed by the governor.
    I write this to show just how diverse education can be from past times to the present and from one state to another.
    I agree with much of what you have written here, Andrew, but when you look at the big picture broadened by what used to be and what is different from state to state, it is a confusing mishmash of facts, opinions, and theories of education that may never come together; thus, there will always be discrepancies in the education individuals receive. I don’t know if there is a solution or if there even should be. Maybe a country or a world with educational diversities is a given.

    Like

Please Leave a Reply (markdown enabled):

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s