What is the value of expression?: Conformity, Capitalism, and Community

Unfortunately, capitalism commodifies everything and everyone and imposes conformity with or without consent across all “imagined communities”: Society assigns all texts subjective economic values. Including expressions. All subjectively. 

Expressions in the form of creating, discovering, thinking, or writing, for example. 

And people have to, in mainstream, contemporary society at least, figure out ways to succeed (and profit!) in a system created above, below, and around the control of any visible sources and understood by no one.

Who What determines, for example, that this painting is worth $1,000,000.00 and this painting is worth $450.00? Is it fair, ethical for us to enjoy such expressions and similar ones without “paying” for them, given the economic system we have? Or is it more fair and ethical to resist such ahuman forces and its corrupting influences? 

How did it develop that most bloggers, including myself, are not paid? I have discovered that people don’t realize that people blog and make popular YouTube videos for the love of expressing and reaching others alone. Once I got a really angry, strange message from someone accusing me of blogging and wanting people to visit my webpage to make lots of money. Similar to grassroots activism or protests in the streets, society has generally decided that human expressions are worth $0. Indeed, blogging costs money. The domain name, server space, ad-free content, and maintenance for my websites all cost real money. 

Because of this, to be involved in any of the creative endeavors (including teaching), is to be something of a rebel, as we’re forced to survive in spite of, not because of, capitalism.

And with the wide-spread availability of the Internet and all of its resources to generate user-created media, more and more people use their time and energy to express — express in the form of blogs, songs, YouTube videos, etc. Such expressions range from the purely educational and informational to pranks to games and much more. Shouldn’t such expressions be compensated? People are using their talents to inform and entertain others in ways free of traditional media forces. Perhaps, our collective community should decide to create a new WPA-like program en masse. Some services like Patreon basically service this purpose. For example, I give $1 each month to CrashCourse, and several dollars to Wikipedia. They have thousands of excellent videos that cover history, government, economics, biology, psychology – they are tackling more areas everyday it seems. But services like Patreon, similar to my PayPal set up, are purely voluntary – creators are not guaranteed any income.   

Given the nature of contemporary capitalism and the “rich getting richer” even expressions distributed in the mainstream are not compensated. People are regularly shocked that a $15-$30-$50 academic book will yield the author maybe $1. Maybe. Musicians too don’t make money selling their songs.

Life, especially the most human of human efforts, should not be about money, of course, but people have to get their ideas out (indeed, one of the costs of my blog besides everyday maintenance is occasional ads on Facebook, Twitter, and StumbleUpon in hopes of “marketing” myself and sharing information that I firmly believe people need to have access to and need to know) and have to survive – life after all is expensive.

So, what is the value of resisting conformity…of expressing? The amount says much about our community’s most sincerely-held values.  

This blog is written as both a thought piece and as a PSA of sorts that people who blog on their own websites or even websites like the HuffingtonPost are not paid. Writing and thinking take time and “are expensive.” Websites have their costs too. Nothing is “free” in capitalism. Please do consider making some kind of donation to some kind of grassroots creative pursuit of your choice. It’s not possible for all of us to contribute and “pay for” everything we use, but we can all do something. Even if it is a “like” or a “good job” or sharing an favorite article or video with a friend. If you would like to donate to a really awesome cause consider Aaron Alon’s film project Bully. He’s raised over $2,000 in the past week. You can donate here.

Andrew Joseph Pegoda



Categories: Thoughts and Perspectives

Tags: , , , ,

7 replies

  1. Thank you Thank you for writing this! From me and all of us bloggers who do this because we love it, and because it’s the right thing to do.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thank YOU so much for reading and commenting and blogging! For a few weeks now, I have been working on a blog. I haven’t figured out anything out except the title (“Because I have no choice”) and rough ideas. But the idea I’m wanting to write about (partly inspired by bell hooks’s comments) is that I do love blogging but it is also emotionally difficult at times – I blog about the ideas I don’t see others talking about most of the time. It’s a duty. Have a good evening! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks for this blog post regarding the value of expression; I really enjoyed it and am definitely recommending this blog to my friends and family. I’m a 15 year old with a blog on finance and economics at shreysfinanceblog.com, and would really appreciate it if you could read and comment on some of my articles, and perhaps follow, reblog and share some of my posts on social media. Thanks again for this fantastic post.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I was JUST having a conversion along this line with a friend of mine. I’ve been trying to get more publications under my belt but realized the other day that one of the publishers who accepted stories from me, unpaid, sells their books at about $15 a piece, give or take a few bucks. So money is being made — by the editors, the publishers — but not by the people who are actually contributing a product to sell, which to me seems very ass backwards. If all of the writers who contribute to them or to publishers like them stopped and thought, “without our product, they wouldn’t have anything to sell,” and based on that didn’t submit anymore…they wouldn’t have anything to sell.

    Creative work is still work. Creative folks are still putting out a product, and ought to be paid for it. After having that conversation I decided I’m not submitting to publishers who don’t pay anymore (with the exception of small projects funded by one or two people who obviously don’t have the money to pay writers, but typically offer at least one free copy of the book in compensation, which feels reasonable to me). Being paid in “exposure” isn’t enough or, from my POV, ethical. I know I’ll have to accept getting far fewer pieces published for the time being, but making sure that I’m actually getting paid for the content I’m creating, even if it’s only a tiny percentage (I’ve made peace with the fact that I won’t be able to survive on writing alone) will be worth it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi there! It really is far too hard for anyone doing any kind of creative work to get recognition and compensation. Just one of the many problems with capitalism and pervasive anti-intellectualism. Hang in there! Keep creating! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

%d bloggers like this: